LASIK. Safety and efficiency

 Numbers on which inform, for safety and efficiency are unclosed for interpreting. In 2003, the Medical Defensive Adnation (MDU), the greatest insurer for doctors in the Great Britain, has informed on 166 %-s' augmentation of the demands involving laser eye surgery; however, MDU asserted, that these demands came to an end first of all from “unrealistic expectations of patients” LASIK, instead of “the defective surgery”. 2003 examination has informed in medical magazine the found Ophthalmology, that almost 18 % of treating patients and 12 % of treated eyes required retreatment. Authors have concluded, that “higher initial correctings, an astigmatism, and advanced age - risk factors for retreatment LASIK.”

 In 2004, the National Institute of the British National Service of public health services of Health and the Clinical (GOOD) Superiority surveyed the systematic review of four randomizirovannyh experiments which control, before a leaving management for use LASIK within NHS. Concerning efficiency of procedure, GOOD, has informed, "the Current sign on LASIK for treatment of refracting errors guesses, that it is effective in the chosen patients with the soft or moderate myopia", but that "the sign is more weak for the efficiency in a serious myopia and a hyperopia." Concerning safety of procedure, GOOD, has informed, that "there are anxieties on safety of procedure in long-term prospect, and the current sign not seems adequate to support its use within NHS without special devices concerning the consent and concerning audit or examination." Advance of refracting surgeons in the Great Britain and the United States, including at least one author of the examination quoted in the report, trusts GOOD, was figured on the information which is strictly dated and weakly explored.